Logical demonstration on coherence of philosophy of science and qualitative methods of research in management.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v16n32.1191

Keywords:

geometric method, qualitative research, qualitative methods, formal logic, management, philosophy

Abstract

Objective. To give clarity and logical coherence to the methodological structure of qualitative research. To argue logical evidence on the philosophy of science and methodological design of management research.  Methods. Information collection: textual exegesis; interpretation: conceptual analysis; logical construction: formal methods of philosophy, geometric method, and proof theory. Results. A coherent structure between branches of philosophy, philosophy of science, qualitative methods of research, formal methods of philosophy and informal methods. It concludes, proposes, and contextualizes on the methods of interpretation in philosophy.  Conclusions:  Practical implications: it allows to shape the methodology of research in social sciences, contributes directly to the research that advances in the philosophical status of management. Originality/Value: Rigorously combines formal structure and logical content. It presents positions of the philosophy of science with important direct and immediate applications in the methodological structuring of any research in social sciences. Type of Article. Reflective paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Camilo Osejo-Bucheli, Universidad de Nariño

 Diseñador e Ingenierio Industrial. Magister en Admnistración de la Universidad del Valle y de la Univerasidad de Nariño. Doctorante en Administración en la Universidad del Valle.  Profesor de la Universidad de Nariño, Unidad Central del Valle, Centro de Investigaciones y estudios Latinoamericanos. Pertenece al Grupo de Investigación Ágora Latinoamericana. Dentro de sus áreas de investigación están la administración y operaciones y la filosofía de la administración.

References

H. Gadamer, Verdad y Método., Salamanca: Sígueme, 1993.

E. Husserl, Ideas, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1962.

G. Psathas, Phenomenological sociology: Issues and applications., NewYork: Wiley, 1973.

P. M. Ferguson, D. L. Ferguson y S. J. & Taylor, Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader., New York: Teachers College Press, 1992.

C. Osejo-Bucheli, «Hacia una filosofía de la administración centrada en el caracter,» 20 02 2021. [En línea]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3810882.

S. Greener, Business Research Methods, online: BookBoon, 2008.

S. Taylor, R. Bogdan y M. DeVault, Introduction to Qualitative methods., New Jersey: Wiley, 2016.

M. Miles, M. Huberman y J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analisys 3ed., London: Sage, 2014.

S. Merriam, Qualitative research., Jossey-Bass, 2009.

S. Tracy, Qualitative Research Methods., Malden: Wiley-Blackwell., 2013.

S. Lapan, M. Quartaroli y F. Riemer, Qualitative research, Jossey-Bass, 2012.

L. E. Given, Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, London: Sage, 2008b.

L. M. Given, The Sage enciclopedia of qualitative research methods, London: Sage, 2008.

J. Jonker y B. Pennink, The essence of research methodology, Nijmegen: Springer, 2010.

C. Cassell y G. Symon, Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research., Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2004.

B. Glaser y A. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory, Piscataway: Aldine Transaction, 1967.

C. Laughame, «Ethnography: research method or philosophy?.,» Nurse Researcher, 3(2), p. 45–54., 1995.

J. E. Barwise, Handbook of mathematical logic, London: Elsevier Science Publishers., 1993.

Merriam-Webster, «Social Science.,» 23 03 2020. [En línea]. Available: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20science.

A. &. B. R. Chanlat, Cátedra abierta de talento humano: segunda lección. El gobierno de las personas y la gestión de las cosas, reflexiones desde el humanismo en la administración: Memorias., Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia., 2004.

G. Deleuze y F. Guattari, What is Philosophy?, New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.

G. Priest, «What is Philosophy?,» Philosophy., pp. 189-207, 2006.

T. Williamson, The Philosophy of Philosophy, John Wiley and sons., 2008.

L. van de Water, «Wat is filosoferen?.,» Bijdragen, 29(2)., pp. 193-203., 1968.

R. McKeon, «Philosophy and Method,» The Journal of Philosophy. V48(22), pp. 653-682, 1951.

R. Hernández, C. Fernández y B. P., Metodología de la investigación. Sexta edición., México.: Editorial Mc Graw Hill. , 2014.

S. Lehti y E. Lehtinen, «Computer-supported Problem-based Learning in the Research Methodology Domain,» Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49 (3):, p. 297–324, 2005.

M. A. Earley, «A synthesis of the literature on research methods education.,» Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), p. 242–253, 2014.

C. Gamboa, Apuntes sobre investigación formativa, Ibagué: Cánon literario, 2013.

L. Ballester, Bases metodológicas de la investigación educativa., Palma: Universitat de les Illes Balears, 2004.

K. Batthyány y M. Cabrera, Metodología de la investigación, Montevideo: Universidad de la República, 2011.

A. Singh, A. Bakar y S. Sararaks, The medical research handbook, Kuala Lumpur.: Clinical Research Center Perak (CRC Perak) e Institute for health systems research (IHSR)., 2008.

Presidencia de Argentina y UNICEF, Documento metodológico orientador para la investigación educativa., Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Ciencia y la Cultura y UNICEF., 2008.

M. F. Ponce y M. Pasco, Guia de investigación.-gestión-, Lima: Pontificia universidad católica del perú., 2015.

C. Bernal, Metodología de la investigación., Bogotá: Pearsons, 2010.

V. C. X. Wang, «Handbook of Research on Scholarly Publishing and Research Methods,» de Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, Hershey, IGI Global, 2015, pp. 1-23.

A. Kelly, Social research methods, London: University of London, 2011.

G. Rugg y M. Petre, A Gentle Guide to Research Methods, Berkshire: McGrawHill., 2007.

J. Dever, «What is Philosophical Methodology?,» de The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology , Oxford, Print Publication Date: May 2016, 2016, pp. 1-26.

S. Kovač, «Remarks on the Origin and foundations of formalisation.,» de Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities., Leiden/Boston., Brill Rodopi, 2015, pp. 163-198.

J. Łukasiewicz, «On Determinism,» de Polish Logic., Oxford:, Oxford University Press, , 1967a, p. 19–39.

J. Pollock, Technical methods in philosophy, Boulder: Westview press, 1990.

A. Schoubye, Formal methods in philosophy, Edinburg: University of Edinburg, 2013.

J. Heizer, B. Render y C. Munson, Operatins Management., Boston: Pearson, 2017.

R. Chase, R. Jacobs y N. Aquilano, Operations Management, San Francisco.: McGraw Hill, 2006.

N. Kienstra, M. Karskens y J. Imants, «Three Approaches to Doing Philosophy: a Proposal for Grouping Philosophical Exercises in Classroom Teaching,» Metaphilosophy, 45(2), p. 288–318, 2014.

V. e. a. Prabhakaran, Methodology of philosophy, University of Calicut, 2011.

E. Martens, «“Praktische Philosophie” aus Fachdidaktischer Perspective—Schwerpunkt: Methodik 1.,» Korrigierte Fassung Vortrags in Bensberg, 1999.

D. W. Smith, «Phenomenology,» 2021. [En línea]. Available: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/>

T. George, «"Hermeneutics",» 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/hermeneutics/

G. Burrell y G. Morgan, Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Hants: Ashgate, 1979.

J. Hussey y R. Hussey, Business Research. A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students., Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1997.

M. Easterby-Smith, R. Thorpe, P. Jackson y L. Jaspersen, Management and business research, London: Sage, 2018.

N. Bunnin y E. Tsui-james, The blackwell companion to philosophy, Berlin: Blackwell publishing, 2003.

M. Steup y N. Ram, «Epistemology,» 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/

M. Schroeder, «Value Theory,» 2020. [En línea]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/value-theory/

A. Bryman y E. Bell, Business research methods, Oxford: Oxford university press, 2007.

A. Bhattacherjee, Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, Tampa: University of South Florida, 2012.

C. Bravin y P. N., Documento metodológico orientador para la investigación educativa., Buenos Aires.: OEI, UNICEF., 2008.

L. Cohen, L. Manion y K. Morrison, Research methods in education., New York: Routledge, 2007.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches (3rd Ed.)., Los Angeles.: SAGE Publications., 2009 .

B. Berelson, Contet Analysis in Communication Research, New York: Free Press, 1952.

K. Dawson, Practical research methods., Oxford: How to books, 2002.

G. Marczyk, D. DeMatteo y D. Festinger, Essentials of research design and methodology, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005.

K. Yang y G. Miller, Handbook of research methods in public administration., Boca Ratón: Taylor and Francis, 2008.

H. Neergaard y J. Ulhøi, Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepeneurship, Cornwall: MPG Books Ltd, 2006.

C. K. Riessman, Narrative Methods for the Human sciences, Thousand oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.

G. W. F. Hegel, Hegel: The phenomenology of spirit, London: Oxford University Press, 2018.

M. Heidegger, Introduction to phenomenological research, Indiana university press, 2005.

M. Ray, «The richness of phenomenology: Philosophic, theoretic and methodologic concerns.,» de Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods., Newbury Park, Sage, 1994, p. 117–133.

A. &. C. J. M. Strauss, Grounded theory in practice, Sage, 1997.

K. Charmaz y L. L. Belgrave, Grounded theory., The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology, 2007.

P. van Inwagen y M. Sullivan, «Metaphysics,» 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/metaphysics/.

M. Paganelli, «Adam smith and the origins of political economy,» Social Philosophy and Policy 37(1), pp. 159-169, 2020.

M. Paganelli, «Adam Smith on the future of experimental evolution and economics,» Journal of Bioeconomics 20(1), pp. 23-28, 2018.

K. Kim, «Adam smith: Natural theology and its implications for his method of social inquiry,» Review of Social Economy 55(3), pp. 312-336, 1997.

G. Freudenthal, «Adam Smith's analytic-synthetic method and the 'system of natural liberty',» History of European Ideas 2(2), pp. 135-154, 1981.

U. Chigbu, «Visually hypothesising in scientific paper writing: Confirming and refuting qualitative research hypotheses using diagrams,» Publications 7(1), p. 22, 2019.

E. DeRosia y G. Christensen, «Blind insights: A new technique for testing a priori hypotheses with qualitative methods,» Qualitative Market Research 12(1), pp. 15-35, 2009.

Universidad privada del norte, Glosario de Investigación., Universidad privada del norte, 2016.

Universidad Cesar Vallejo., Diseño y desarrollo de proyecto investigación, Trujillo: Universidad Cesar Vallejo., 2013.

S. Sandoval y P. Wong-González, «Región y sociedad,» Región y sociedad vol.17 no.33 , pp. 152-165, 2005.

J. Łukasiewicz, «Philosophical Remarks on Many-Valued Systems of Propositional Logic,» Polish Logic, p. 40–65, 1967b.

C. Osejo-Bucheli, «Discovery of blind spots in the epistemology of studies in operations management regarding the curriculum of humanism in administration.,» 1, 12, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3812005.

C. Kothari, Research methodology, methods and techniques., New Delhi: New age international., 2004.

U. Sekaran, Research methods for business, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

Published

2021-08-10

How to Cite

Osejo-Bucheli, C. . (2021). Logical demonstration on coherence of philosophy of science and qualitative methods of research in management. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 16(32), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v16n32.1191

Altmetric

QR Code
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo