Proposal for a relationship between educational paradigms and engineering teaching-learning techniques

Palabras clave: Educación, aprendizaje, técnicas de enseñanza, competencias, educación en ingeniería


Durante siglos, los docentes de ingeniería han utilizado paradigmas educativos y estrategias o técnicas de enseñanza que se asocian principalmente a la repetición de prácticas de enseñanza basadas en modelos exitosos que han visto, sin comprenderlos de manera más exhaustiva. El marco normativo de renombre internacional ABET ha redefinido el papel de la educación de ingenieros, incluidas las habilidades profesionales, como el liderazgo, la comunicación, la comprensión de la ética, la capacidad de trabajar en equipo y la profesionalidad de la ingeniería en un contexto global y social, fomentando el aprendizaje permanente, y el conocimiento de temas contemporáneos. Estas competencias que exigen estas organizaciones, es necesario utilizar técnicas didácticas de enseñanza-aprendizaje en el aula. Como resultado, la necesidad de analizar el papel y el propósito de los educadores de ingeniería, es algo esencial en el contexto de esta investigación, proporcionando una guía para comprender el complejo proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje de sus estudiantes. Esta revisión bibliográfica, brinda al docente de ingeniería una guía de qué técnica didáctica se puede aplicar en el aula, según las habilidades y destrezas que desee desarrollar en sus alumnos.

Biografía del autor/a

Gonzalo Garcés, Universidad del Bío-Bío

as a Civil Engineer (PE), he received a BSC. in Civil Engineering from the Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chile. He has dedicated part of his professional life to engineering education, specifically focused on the study of educational paradigms and teaching techniques used in engineering education. His work has been published in high-impact journals, such as the International Journal of Engineering Education and the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

Eric Forcael, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Concepción, Chile

is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chile. He earned his BSC. in Civil Engineering from the Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chile, his MBA from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain, and his MSc. and PhD. in Civil Engineering from the University of Florida, USA. His research interests include modeling and simulation in construction and civil engineering, and engineering education. His work has been published in high impact journals including Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, and Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

Referencias bibliográficas

American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Engineers’ Council for Professional Development. Science 94(2446): pp. 611, 1941. DOI: 10.1126/science.93.2426.611

ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.) Curricular Objectives. Accreditation Yearbook. Baltimore, 1994.

Ramírez, F., Seco, A., and Cobo, E. P. New values for twenty-first century engineering. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 137(4), pp. 211-214, 2011. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000068.

Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and McGourty, J., The ABET “Professional Skills - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), pp. 41-55. 2005. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x.

ASCE Steering Committee 2007. The vision for civil engineering in 2025. [online]. [accessed February 18th of 2019]. Available at:

Shelton, R., Withington, S., Burr-Darling, A. and Gridley-Kilgour, F. Engineering in History. Dover Publications, New York, 1990.

Easa, S., Li, S. and Shi, K., Urban planning and development applications of GIS. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2000.

Simon, H.A., The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial intelligence 4(3-4), pp. 181-201, 1973. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8.

Rittel, H.W. and Webber, M.M., Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), pp. 155-169, 1973.

Wals, A.E., (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world: principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, 2007.

Bulleit, W., Schmidt, J., Alvi, I., Nelson, E. and Rodriguez-Nikl, T., Philosophy of engineering: what it is and why it matters. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice141(3), art. 02514003, 2014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000205.

Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A., Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, Oxford, UK, 1973.

Bryden, K.M., Hallinan, K.P. and Pinnell, M.F., A different path to internationalization of engineering education. In: 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers Education Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 2002.

Pinnell, M.F. and Chuck, L., Developing Technical competency and enhancing the soft skills of undergraduate mechanical engineering students through service-learning. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 1601. Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.

Graaff, E., Saunders-Smits, S. and Nieweg, M., (Eds.), Research and practice of active learning in engineering education. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005.

Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M. and Rogers, C., Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering

Education 97(3), pp. 369-387. 2008 DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x.

Bowman, B.A. and Farr, J.V., Embedding leadership in civil engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 126(1), pp. 16-20. 2000. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2000)126:1(16).

Sacks, R. and Barak, R., Teaching building information modeling as an integral part of freshman year civil engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 136(1), pp. 30-38. 2009. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000003.

Ernst, E., Review of reports, studies and conference on engineering education 1981-1997. In: Proceedings Engineering Foundation, New York, 2001, pp. 129-143.

Prince, M.J., and Felder, R.M., Inductive Teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education 95(2), pp. 123-138. 2006 DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.

Siller, T.J., Sustainability and critical thinking in civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 127(3), pp. 104-108. 2001. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2001)127:3(104).

Russell, J.S. and Stouffer, W., Survey of the National civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 131(2), pp. 118-128. 2005. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:2(118).

Meyer, M. and Marx, S., Engineering dropouts: a qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 104(4), pp. 525-548, 2014. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20054.

Eishani, K., Saa'd, E. and Nami, Y., The relationship between learning styles and creativity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 114(1), pp. 52-55, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.655.

Bourn, D. and Sharma, N., Global and sustainability issues for engineering graduates. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 161(3), September, 2008, pp. 199-206.

Patton, M., Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1990.

Borrego, M., Douglas, E.P. and Amelink, C.T., Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 98(1), pp. 53-66. 2009. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x.

Kuhn, T., Tradition mathématique et tradition expérimentale dans le développement de la physique. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 30(5), pp. 975-998, 1975.

Koetting, J.R., Foundations of naturalistic inquiry: developing a theory base for understanding individual interpretations of reality. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, Texas, 1984.

Borrell, N., Organización escolar. Teoría sobre las corrientes científicas. Humanitas, Barcelona, España, 1989.

Gómez, A., Puigvert, L. and Flecha, R., Critical communicative methodology: informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry 17(3), pp. 235-245, 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1077800410397802.

Montfort, D., Brown, S. and Shinew, D., The personal epistemologies of civil engineering faculty. Journal of Engineering Education 103(3), pp. 388-416. 2014 DOI: 10.1002/jee.20050.

Smith, K.A., Sheppard, Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), pp. 87-101. 2005 DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x.

Jonassen, D., Strobel, J. and Lee, C.B., Everyday problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95(2), pp. 139-151, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.

Reason, P. and Rowan, J., Human Inquiry in action. development in new paradigm research. Sage Publications, London, UK, 1988.

Solomon, R.C. and Sherman, D., The Blackwell Guide to continental philosophy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Padstow, UK, 2003.

Gur-Ze’ev, I., Adorno and horkheimer: Diasporic philosophy, negative theology, and counter‐education. Educational Theory 55(3), pp. 343-365,112 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2005.00007.x.

Aubert, A. and Soler, M., Dialogism: the dialogic turn in the social sciences, in: Kincheloe, J. and Horn, R. (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of education and psychology. Greenwood Press, Westport, USA, 2006, pp. 521-529.

Sloat, K.C., Tharp, R.G. and Gallimore, R., The incremental effectiveness of classroom-based teacher-training techniques. Behavior Therapy 8(5), pp. 810-818, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80152-4.

Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D. and Pollock, J.E., Classroom instruction that works: research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, USA, 2001.

Lammers, W.J. and Murphy, J.J., A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom: a descriptive profile of a US public university. Active Learning in Higher Education 3(1), pp. 54-67. 2002 DOI: 10.1177/1469787402003001005.

Andrews, P., Mathematics teachers’ didactic strategies: examining the comparative potential of low inference generic descriptors. Comparative Education Review 53(4), pp. 559-581. 2009. DOI: 10.1086/603583.

Hus, V., and Grmek, M.I., Didactic strategies in early science teaching. Educational Studies, 37(2), pp. 159-169, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2010.506336.

Brown, G. and Atkins, M., Effective teaching in higher education. Routledge, London, UK, 1988.

Bishop, J.L. and Verleger, M.A., The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Vol. 30, Atlanta, USA, 2013, pp. 1-18.

Vaishnavi, V.K. and Kuechler, W., Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015.

Macdonald, E., Salas, R., Espalin, D., Perez, M., Aguilera, E., Muse, D. and Wicker, R.B., 3D printing for the rapid prototyping of structural electronics. IEEE Access 2, 2014, pp. 234-242. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2311810.

Pozo, J.I., Teorías cognitivas del aprendizaje. Ediciones Morata, S.L., Madrid, España, 1997.

Mazur, E., Farewell, lecture? Science 323(5910), pp. 50-51. 2009. DOI: 10.1126/science.1168927.

Lázaro, A. and Asensi, J., Manual de orientación escolar y tutoría, Narcea, España, 1987.

Rangel, C.M., Silva, R.A. and Pinto, A.M., Fuel cells and on-demand hydrogen production: didactic demonstration prototype. In: 2007 International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical, IEEE, Portugal, 2007, pp. 274-278. DOI: 10.1109/POWERENG.2007.4380191.

Pimienta, J.H., Estrategias de enseñanza-aprendizaje, Pearson Educación, México, 2012.

Boehrer, J. and Linsky, M., Teaching with cases: learning to question, in: Svinick, M.D. (Ed.), The changing face of college teaching. new directions for teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA, 1990.

Moran, J., Queuing for beginners: the story of daily life from breakfast to bedtime. Profile Books, London, UK, 2007.

Boghici, S.T. and Boghici, C., The interactive methods and techniques stimulating creativity-crucial components of the didactic strategies. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series VIII: Performing Arts 6(2), pp. 23-28, 2013.

Novak, J.D., Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27(10), pp. 937-949, 1990. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660271003.

Walker, J.M. and King, P.H., Concept mapping as a form of student assessment and instruction in the domain of bioengineering. Journal of Engineering Education 92(2), pp. 167-178, 2013 DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660271003.

Buzan, T. and Buzan, B., The mind map book: how to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. Plume, New York, USA, 1996.

Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., Cooperation and competition: theory and research. Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN, 1989.

Smith, K.A., Cooperative learning: effective teamwork for engineering classrooms. In: Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995, 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century, Vol. 1, IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1995, pp. 2b5.13-2b5.18. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.1995.483059.

Ogle, D.M., KWL: a teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher 39(6), pp. 564-570, 1986. DOI: 10.1598/RT.39.6.11.

Portmann, M. and Easterbrook, S., PMI: knowledge elicitation and De Bono's thinking tools. In: 6th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop Heidelberg and Kaiserslautern, Germany, vol. 599, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, May, 1992, pp. 264-282.

Young, D.B. and Tamir, P., Identifying what students know. Science Teacher, 44(6), pp. 26-27, 1977.

Tamir, P. and Amir, R., Retrospective curriculum evaluation: an approach to the evaluation of long-term effects. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(3), pp. 259-278, 1981. DOI: 10.1080/03626784.1981.11075259.

Iglesias, I., La creatividad en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de ele: caracterización y aplicaciones. In: X Congreso Internacional de la ASELE, 2, Cádiz, 1999, pp. 941-954.

Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B., Learning how to learn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984.

Bruner, J.S., Some elements of discovery, in: Shulman, L.S. and Keislar, E.R., Eds., Learning by discovery: a critical appraisa. Rand McNally & Co, Chicago, USA, 1966, pp. 101-113.

Taylor, P., Improving graduate student seminar presentations through training. Teaching of Psychology, 19(4), pp. 236-238, 1992.

Ibert, J., Baumard, P., Donada, C. and Xuereb, J., Data collection and managing the data source, in: Doing management research, a comprehensive guide. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, California, USA, 2001, pp. 172-195.

Ausubel, D., The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune Stratton, New York, USA, 1963.

Biggs, J.B. and Tang, C., Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. McGraw-Hill Education, Berkshire, USA, 2011.

Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J., Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Virginia, USA, 2005.

Blank, W. and Harwell, S.H. (Eds.) Promising Practices for connecting high school to the real world. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA, 1997.

Dickinson, K.P., Soukamneuth, S., Yu, H C., Kimball, M., D’Amico, R., and Perry, R., Technical assistance guide: providing educational services in the Summer Youth Employment and Training Program. [online]. 1998. [accessed January 12, 2019]. Available at: /fulltext/ED420756.pdf

Barrows, H.S., A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education 20(6), pp. 481-486, 1986. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x.

Schulz, M., Reuding, T. and Ertl, T., Analyzing engineering simulations in a virtual environment. IEEE computer Graphics and Applications 18(6), pp. 46-52, 1998. DOI: 10.1109/38.734979

Garrett, M., Schoener, L. and Hood, L., Debate: a teaching strategy to improve verbal communication and critical-thinking skills. Nurse Educator, 21(4), pp. 37-40, 1996.

Wassermann, S., El estudio de casos como método de enseñanza. Amorrortu Editores, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1994.

Arter, J., Using portfolios in instruction and assessment. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, Oregon, USA, 1990.

Danielson, C. and Abrutyn, L., An introduction to using portfolios in the classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, USA, 1997.

Azn, H., Evaluation of midwifery students in labor and delivery training: comparing two methods of logbook and checklist. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 6(2), pp. 123-128, 2006.

Taylor, S.J. and Bogdan, R., Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación, Paidós Ed., Barcelona, España, 1987.

Mayer, R. and Ouellet, F., Métodologie de recherche pour les intervenants sociaux. Gaëtan Morin Éditeur, Boucherville, Canada, 1991.

Osborn, A., Applied imagination. Charles Scribner’s Sons, Oxford, UK. 1953.

Roozenburg, N. and Eekels, J., Product design: fundamentals & methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, UK, 1995.

Wilkins, B., Facilitating online learning: training ta’s to facilitate community, collaboration, and mentoring in the online environment. Dr. dissertation, Department of Instructional Psychology and Technology, Brigham Young University, USA, 2002.

Shaftel, F.R. and Shaftel, G., Role-playing for social values: decision-making in the social studies. Prentice- Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1967.

Jinks, R., Developing experimental skills in engineering undergraduates. Engineering Science and Education Journal 3(6), pp. 287-290, 1994. DOI: 10.1049/esej:19940610

Jacoby, B., Service-learning in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA, 1996.

Oakes, W., Duffy, J., Jacobius, T., Linos, P., Lord, S., Schultz, W.W. and Smith, A., Service-learning in engineering., In: 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 2002, pp. F3A-1-F3A-6. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1158178.

Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K., Learning and teaching styles in engineering education., Engineering Education 78(7), pp. 674-681, 1998.

Kvam, P.H., The effect of active learning methods on student retention in engineering statistics. The American Statistician 54(2), pp. 136-140, 2000. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2000.10474526.

Prince, M., Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93(3), pp. 223-231, 2004. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M.P., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(23), pp. 8410-8415, 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

Chan, P.W. and Raisanen, C., Imagining a Sustainable future: shaping emergent thinking by reflecting through aesthetic action. The Engineering Project Organization Journal, 7(1), pp. 83-98, 2017.

Quist, J., Rammelt, C., Overschie, M. and de Werk, G., Backcasting for sustainability in engineering education: the case of Delft University of Technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9-11), pp. 868-876, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.032.

Segalàs, J., Ferrer-Balas, D. and Mulder, K.F., What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses?. The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(3), pp. 275-284, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.012

ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.), Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018-2019. [online]. [accessed October 15, 2019]. Available at: accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019.

Cómo citar
Garcés, G., & Forcael, E. (2020). Proposal for a relationship between educational paradigms and engineering teaching-learning techniques. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 15(29), 104-113.